Minority shareholder of corporation brought action against majority shareholder and corporation, alleging violations of the shareholder oppression provision of the Business Corporation Act (BCA). The Supreme Court held that: (1) there was no statutory right to a jury trial for claims under the shareholder oppression provision; (2) there was no state constitutional right to a jury trial for such claims; and (3) violations of shareholder agreements could constitute evidence of oppression under the BCA. Reversed and remanded.